Supplementary Material: Diverse Image Annotation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Here we present the results of different methods, evaluated by conventional metrics, including precision (P), recall (R) and F1 score, on ESP Game and IAPRTC-12, as shown in Table 2. ML-MG shows the best performance in all cases, which has also verified in [1]. In contrast, DPP-S-sampling gives the worst performance in all cases. The obvious reason is MLMG picks the most representative tags in top-k tags, such that more positive tags could be retrieved. In contrast, the diversity encourages DPP-S-sampling to cover tags from different semantic paths, such that some negative labels maybe included. However, as shown in the main manuscript, the conventional metrics are much less consistent with human evaluation than the semantic metrics.
منابع مشابه
Fuzzy Neighbor Voting for Automatic Image Annotation
With quick development of digital images and the availability of imaging tools, massive amounts of images are created. Therefore, efficient management and suitable retrieval, especially by computers, is one of themost challenging fields in image processing. Automatic image annotation (AIA) or refers to attaching words, keywords or comments to an image or to a selected part of it. In this paper,...
متن کاملTags Re-ranking Using Multi-level Features in Automatic Image Annotation
Automatic image annotation is a process in which computer systems automatically assign the textual tags related with visual content to a query image. In most cases, inappropriate tags generated by the users as well as the images without any tags among the challenges available in this field have a negative effect on the query's result. In this paper, a new method is presented for automatic image...
متن کاملSemantic-Based Image Retrial in the VQ Compressed Domain using Image Annotation Statistical Models
متن کامل
Supplementary Material for Fast Zero-Shot Image Tagging
We present another set of experiments conducted on the widely used IAPRTC-12 [6] dataset. We use the same tag annotation and image training-test split as described in [7] for our experiments. There are 291 unique tags and 19627 images in IAPRTC12. The dataset is split to 17341 training images and 2286 testing images. We further separate 15% from the training images as our validation set. Table ...
متن کاملFilling annotation gaps in yeast genomes using genome-wide contact maps
MOTIVATIONS De novo sequencing of genomes is followed by annotation analyses aiming at identifying functional genomic features such as genes, non-coding RNAs or regulatory sequences, taking advantage of diverse datasets. These steps sometimes fail at detecting non-coding functional sequences: for example, origins of replication, centromeres and rDNA positions have proven difficult to annotate w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017